Prosecute the Pope as an accomplice to sex crimes
Papal visit to the UK should be cancelled, says Protest the Pope campaign
London, UK – 28 March 2010
Fifty protesters from humanist, secular, women’s and gay organisations today accused the Pope of “covering up child sex abuse by Catholic clergy,” calling him a “protector of paedophile priests” and “an accomplice to sex crimes.”
They demanded: “The Pope must resign” and “Prosecute the Pope for collusion with sex abusers.”
Their protest took place at 12 noon today, Palm Sunday (28 March 2010), outside London’s Westminster Cathedral, the main Catholic church in Britain.
The protesters were greeted by a mixture of jeers and support from Catholic congregants leaving the Cathedral after Palm Sunday mass. A few applauded the protesters. Others heckled. Most kept their feelings to themselves.
See photos of the Protest the Pope demonstration here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/outrage/sets/72157623721503634/
These photos are free to use. Please credit Chris Houston of OutRage!
“In 2001, the Pope wrote to all Catholic Bishops worldwide, ordering them to maintain ‘Papal secrecy’ about sex abuse by clergy. He threatened to excommunicate anyone who spoke about it. This makes the Pope personally responsible for the cover-up,” said human rights campaigner, Peter Tatchell, of the Protest the Pope campaign, which organised today’s protest.
“Pope Benedict’s recent apology is inadequate because he has not apologised for his own failure to act against paedophile priests. He has not said sorry for his own role in covering up their sex crimes.
“The Pope knew about child sex abuse by Catholic clergy. He failed to stop it and he failed to report the abusers to the police. His moral authority is irreversibly tarnished. He should resign.
“We intend to investigate whether the Pope can be prosecuted as an accomplice to child sex abuse. If anyone anyone else was involved in protecting paedophiles from prosecution, they’d probably be arrested as accomplices. Why should the Pope be treated differently? There is strong evidence of his collusion with sex abusing clergy. We believe the Pope should face a criminal investigation on charges of complicity.
“The Pope failed to ensure that priests who raped and sexually abused young people were reported to the police. This is why he is not welcome in the UK and why we object to him being honoured with a State Visit in September, especially a State Visit that is being partly funded by the taxpayer. His visit should be called off.
“The world renowned Swiss Catholic theologian, Rev Father Hans Kung, has accused the Pope of ‘co-responsibility’ for the cover-up of priestly sex abuse and criticised the weakness and evasions of his recent apology. Rev Father Kung urged:
“In the name of truth, Joseph Ratzinger, the man who for decades was mainly responsible for the concealment of these abuses at a world level, should have pronounced a mea culpa.”
See here:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article7067069.ece
“Pope Benedict has direct personal responsibility for allowing many paedophile priests to escape justice.
“According to a 2006 BBC Panorama programme, Sex Crimes And The Vatican, in 2001, while he was Cardinal Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI issued a secret Vatican edict to all Catholic bishops. It recommended that instead of reporting child sex abusers to the police, bishops should report them to the Vatican and encourage the victims to take an oath to not talk about the abuse they suffered. To keep victims quiet, the Pope warned that if they broke their oath and repeated the sex abuse allegations they should be excommunicated.
“Benedict XVI put the interests and image of the church before the welfare of children and young people. He is unfit to remain as Pope.
“The Panorama programme revealed details of the Pope’s leading role in the cover-up of sexual assaults by Catholic clergy. It reported that the Vatican knowingly harboured and protected paedophile clergymen. Priests accused of child sex abuse were mostly not sacked or reported to the police but simply moved to another parish, often to reoffend. The BBC gave examples of church hush funds being used to silence the victims,” said Mr Tatchell.
Sunday’s protest was organised by the Protest the Pope campaign: http://www.protest-the-pope.org.uk/
‘Protest the Pope’ is a campaign against the Pope being honoured with a State Visit to Britain. We object to the Pope’s often harsh, intolerant views on a wide range of social issues and his cover-up of child sex abuse by Catholic clergy. He is unsuitable to be honoured with a State Visit. He is not welcome in the UK.
More information about Sunday’s protest:
Peter Tatchell – 0207 403 1790
Evidence against the Pope:
BBC Panorama, Sex crimes and the Vatican, 1 October 2006.
Full transcript:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/5402928.stm
BBC website summary:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/5389684.stm
YouTube excerpt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06qhnIwEdHE&feature=related
See also:
Evening Standard, Pope ‘led cover-up of child abuse by priests’, 30 September 2006
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23369148-pope-led-cover-up-of-child-abuse-by-priests.do
Washington Post, The Great Catholic Cover-Up, 16 March 2010
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2010/03/the_great_catholic_cover-up.html
New York Times, Abuse Scandal in Germany Edges Closer to Pope, 12 March 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/world/europe/13pope.html
New York Times, Memo to Pope described transfer of pedophile priest, 26 March 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/world/europe/26church.html
The National Catholic Reporter, Ratzinger’s responsibility, 18 March 2010:
http://ncronline.org/news/accountability/ratzingers-responsibility?page=1
Rev Father Hans Kung wrote:
“In his 24 years as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, from around the world, all cases of grave sexual offences by clerics had to be reported, under strictest secrecy (“secretum pontificum”), to his curial office, which was exclusively responsible for dealing with them. Ratzinger himself, in a letter on “grave sexual crimes” addressed to all the bishops under the date of 18 May, 2001, warned the bishops, under threat of ecclesiastical punishment, to observe “papal secrecy” in such cases. In his five years as Pope, Benedict XVI has done nothing to change this practice with all its fateful consequences.’’
http://ncronline.org/news/accountability/ratzingers-responsibility?page=1